
What 19 Seattle Educators Learned About Teaching Israel
February 19, 2026
For years, the Jewish community has looked to the Catholic parochial system as the gold standard for middle-income affordability. This report moves beyond aspiration, providing a rigorous analysis of the structural cost drivers in each system alongside a comprehensive financial model to determine what it would actually take to achieve tuition parity.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report was prompted by a specific challenge. Jewish day school tuition has reached levels that threaten the long-term viability of day school education for many Jewish families across North America. Over the past two years, leading Jewish voices have called on the Jewish community to change this by making Jewish day school tuition comparable to that of Catholic schools, where tuition below $10,000 per year can be found in every major American city. But the call has remained largely rhetorical, because the structural and financial analysis required to understand what it would actually take did not exist.
The central finding of this research is that the gap is primarily structural. In the Catholic school model, the local church and Diocese subsidize the operating budget, while absorbing significant indirect costs through structural integration with the parish. This ‘Parish Subsidy’ is the foundational advantage the independent Jewish day school model lacks.
Jewish day schools, by contrast, have four distinct cost drivers: The dual curriculum, which effectively doubles instructional headcount; Small class sizes, which drive up per-pupil cost; Surging security expenditures, a non-negotiable, growing liability; And independent nonprofit status, which means that, unlike many Catholic schools, Jewish day schools shoulder the full cost of facilities, administration, and operations alone.
However, recent data from Seattle and Chicago indicates that significant improvements in affordability are achievable through large-scale, unified philanthropic intervention. The Samis Foundation’s Day School Affordability Initiative (DSA) and the Crown Family Philanthropies Tuition Accessibility Partnership (TAP) are both showing promising results. The key to their success is a single community-wide guarantor that mimics the Parish Subsidy model.
This report provides the structural analysis and financial modeling to understand what it would actually take to bring Jewish day school tuition to Catholic school levels.




